Ten Strategies for the Trinity: God as Transcendental Multiplicity and Ipsa Relationalitas
's logical consistency. It is not my intention, however, to retrace here the salient points and studies of this debate (for several such overviews, see Morris, 1991, chap. 9; Inwagen, 1998; McCall & Rea, 2009; Damonte, 2009; McCall, 2010; Tuggy, 2003, 2016; Bertini, 2015). I recently propos...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Italien |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Università degli Studi di Urbino
2019
|
Dans: |
Nuovo giornale di filosofia della religione
Année: 2019, Volume: 9, Pages: 1-20 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Fede
B Ontology B Monoteismo B Reason B Phenomenology B Filosofia della Religione B Religione B Filosofia B Essere B Ebraismo B God B Ontologia B Foi B philosophy of religion B Cristianesimo B Religion B Faith B Metaphysics B Christianity B Dio B Ermeneutica B Ragione B Dieu B Hebraism B Philosophie des religions B Metafisica B Fenomenologia B Philosophy |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | 's logical consistency. It is not my intention, however, to retrace here the salient points and studies of this debate (for several such overviews, see Morris, 1991, chap. 9; Inwagen, 1998; McCall & Rea, 2009; Damonte, 2009; McCall, 2010; Tuggy, 2003, 2016; Bertini, 2015). I recently proposed (Migliorini, 2019a) - after an evaluation of that debate - to consider the Trinitarian doctrine as contradictory, while also formulating an Argument (which I described as "Kantian-Inspired") that should still allow us to believe in the Trinity. The Argument runs as follows: . . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2532-1676 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Nuovo giornale di filosofia della religione
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14276/2532-1676/3148 |