Cross-Cultural Differences in Informal Argumentation: Norms, Inductive Biases and Evidentiality
Cross-cultural differences in argumentation may be explained by the use of different norms of reasoning. However, some norms derive from, presumably universal, mathematical laws. This inconsistency can be resolved, by considering that some norms of argumentation, like Bayes theorem, are mathematical...
| Authors: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Journal of cognition and culture
Year: 2018, Volume: 18, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 358-389 |
| Further subjects: | B
cultural differences
Bayesian argumentation
source reliability
evidentiality
inductive biases
rational norms
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |