Rational Insight and Partisan Justification: Responding to Bogardus and Burton, Thurow, and Kvanvig

This paper discusses responses to Disagreement, Deference, and Rational Commitment from Bogardus and Burton, Thurow, and Kvanvig. Each of these responses objects to the rationalist account of “partisan justification” defended in the book. After explaining partisan justification and its significance,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Pittard, John (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2023
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Jahr: 2023, Band: 13, Heft: 4, Seiten: 325-360
weitere Schlagwörter:B rational insight
B Impartiality
B Disagreement
B Reflection
B partisan justification
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 187113000X
003 DE-627
005 20231126000846.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231125s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10070  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)187113000X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP187113000X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1201053641  |0 (DE-627)1684196442  |4 aut  |a Pittard, John 
109 |a Pittard, John 
245 1 0 |a Rational Insight and Partisan Justification: Responding to Bogardus and Burton, Thurow, and Kvanvig 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper discusses responses to Disagreement, Deference, and Rational Commitment from Bogardus and Burton, Thurow, and Kvanvig. Each of these responses objects to the rationalist account of “partisan justification” defended in the book. After explaining partisan justification and its significance, I first take up Bogardus and Burton’s argument for a more restrictive account of partisan justification which says that partisan justification requires certainty. I argue that this account yields implausible discontinuities in the verdicts given to nearly identical cases. Next, I consider Thurow’s suggestion that perceptual evidence can provide partisan justification without supporting rational insight. I explain why insight plays a crucial role in cases where perceptual beliefs enjoy partisan justification. Finally, I address Kvanvig’s objection that my account of partisan justification applies only to highly reflective agents. I argue that a subject’s actual reflectiveness does not bear on the sense of justification principally at issue in the disagreement literature. 
601 |a Partisan 
650 4 |a Reflection 
650 4 |a Impartiality 
650 4 |a Disagreement 
650 4 |a partisan justification 
650 4 |a rational insight 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 13(2023), 4, Seite 325-360  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2023  |g number:4  |g pages:325-360 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10070  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/13/4/article-p325_005.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2023  |e 4  |h 325-360 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4417559058 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 187113000X 
LOK |0 005 20231125055505 
LOK |0 008 231125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-11-24#4387082E5DA71E38BD0D14FD2C2E2D1E97748F10 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL