'Why don't We Translate Spells in the Scriptures?': Medieval Chinese Exegesis on the Meaning and Function of Dhāraṇī Language

The work of the translator involves difficult choices. But this difficulty is compounded when dealing with special kinds of language, such as Buddhist dhāraṇī. When faced with the choice to translate or transcribe Indic spells into Chinese, the translation workshops led by Dharmarakṣa and Kumārajīva...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Overbey, Ryan Richard (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters Publishers 2019
In: Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 42, Pages: 493-514
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The work of the translator involves difficult choices. But this difficulty is compounded when dealing with special kinds of language, such as Buddhist dhāraṇī. When faced with the choice to translate or transcribe Indic spells into Chinese, the translation workshops led by Dharmarakṣa and Kumārajīva made decisions that in turn produced exegetical dilemmas. In this article I survey early medieval Chinese commentaries on the dhāraṇī chapter of the Lotus Sūtra. These commentaries reveal that there was no clear or stable theory for understanding the efficacy of dhāraṇī. Instead, Chinese exegetes put forward a range of possible underlying mechanisms for dhāraṇī language.
ISSN:2507-0347
Contains:Enthalten in: International Association of Buddhist Studies, Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/JIABS.42.0.3287486