Pure reason and contemporary philosophy of religion: the rational striving in and for truth

This essay urges contemporary philosophers of religion to rethink the role that Kant’s critical philosophy has played both in establishing the analytic nature of modern philosophy and in developing a critique of reason’s drive for the unconditioned. In particular, the essay demonstrates the contribu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Pamela Sue (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2010
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 95-106
Further subjects:B Limits
B Critique
B Conatus
B Analytic
B Spinoza
B Boundaries
B Reflective critical openness
B Reason
B Kant
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821416953
003 DE-627
005 20221110052727.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-010-9245-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821416953 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821416953 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Anderson, Pamela Sue  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Anderson, Pamela Sue  |a Anderson, Pamela S. 
245 1 0 |a Pure reason and contemporary philosophy of religion: the rational striving in and for truth 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay urges contemporary philosophers of religion to rethink the role that Kant’s critical philosophy has played both in establishing the analytic nature of modern philosophy and in developing a critique of reason’s drive for the unconditioned. In particular, the essay demonstrates the contribution that Kant and other modern rationalists such as Spinoza can still make today to our rational striving in and for truth. This demonstration focuses on a recent group of analytic philosophers of religion who have labelled their own work ‘analytic theology’ and have generated new debates, including new arguments about Kant bridging philosophy and theology. Cultivation of a reflective critical openness is encouraged here; this is a practice for checking reason’s overly ambitious claims about God. 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Spinoza 
650 4 |a Reflective critical openness 
650 4 |a Reason 
650 4 |a Limits 
650 4 |a Kant 
650 4 |a Critique 
650 4 |a Conatus 
650 4 |a Boundaries 
650 4 |a Analytic 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 68(2010), 1, Seite 95-106  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:68  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:95-106 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646896106  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981211  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9245-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 68  |j 2010  |e 1  |h 95-106 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208220961 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821416953 
LOK |0 005 20221110052727 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#C50A9B963F9919F28564050C035A62A866A1FADD 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/40981211 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL