Reflections on Wolfart, Challenges to Religious Literacy, and Course Design

Despite its recent prominence as a rationale for the academic study of religion, Professor Wolfart shows both that “religious literacy” has been poorly defined and that little evidence has been adduced for its positive effects. Yet the institutional and social pressures that have led some to embrace...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Gallagher, Eugene V. 1950- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2022
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Jahr: 2022, Band: 34, Heft: 5, Seiten: 465-474
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Wissen / Religion / Religionswissenschaftliches Studium / Religionspädagogik / Unterrichtsplanung
RelBib Classification:AA Religionswissenschaft
AH Religionspädagogik
weitere Schlagwörter:B course design
B Kommentar
B introductory courses
B Literacy
B Religious Literacy
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Despite its recent prominence as a rationale for the academic study of religion, Professor Wolfart shows both that “religious literacy” has been poorly defined and that little evidence has been adduced for its positive effects. Yet the institutional and social pressures that have led some to embrace religious literacy as a positive argument for the academic study of religion persist, and the essay offers no alternative conception of the broad goals towards which collegiate education about religion should be directed. It is worth considering, therefore, whether some of the flaws with religious literacy as an educational approach might be remedied. In particular, this response proposes that the yawning gap between the abstract goal and the fact that in the U.S. most undergraduates will take only a single course in the study poses a challenge of course design. Carefully designing courses for religious literacy might diminish the imprecision in the concept and provide more tangible evidence of what religiously literate students might be able to do.
ISSN:1570-0682
Bezug:Kommentar zu "‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations (2022)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-bja10080