Alevilik Felsefî Bir Din Midir? (Alevî-Bektaşî Kardeşlerimize Bir Nidâ!)
In this article entitled "Is Alevism a philosophical religion?" has been given place to be exhibited inconsistencies and criticisms of efforts to base on first age materialism Alevism of Ismail Özmen and Esat Korkmaz. On the one hand, moreover, the ideas that Esat Korkmaz asserts that Alev...
| Autres titres: | Is Alevism a Philosophical Religion? (a Call to Alevi-Bektashi Brothers!) |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Turc |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
DergiPark Akademik
2009
|
| Dans: |
Dinî araştırmalar
Année: 2009, Volume: 12, Numéro: 33, Pages: 161-204 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B Alevism B Tanrı Anlayışı B Teoloji B Materyalizm B Alevilik B Philosophical Religion B Felsefi Din B Understanding of God B Materialism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In this article entitled "Is Alevism a philosophical religion?" has been given place to be exhibited inconsistencies and criticisms of efforts to base on first age materialism Alevism of Ismail Özmen and Esat Korkmaz. On the one hand, moreover, the ideas that Esat Korkmaz asserts that Alevism is a philosophical religion have been criticized, on the other hand idea whether a philosophical religion is possible has been analysed. The inconsistencies of this idea have been tried to be revealed; deflecting efforts from the natural channel Alevism andBektashism by benefiting from Esat Korkmaz's hegel dialectic have been criticized on the basis of written sources of Alevism, and inconsistencies carried on themself this efforts have been shown one by one |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2602-2435 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Dinî araştırmalar
|