Samuel Hirsch, Hegel, and the Legacy of Ethical Monotheism
This essay examines Samuel Hirsch’s Religious Philosophy of the Jews as a forerunner of twentieth-century works of ethical monotheism in modern Jewish thought. In particular, it explores Hirsch’s use of the dichotomy between monotheism and idolatry as a way to resist Hegel’s attempts to incorporate...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Harvard theological review
Année: 2020, Volume: 113, Numéro: 1, Pages: 89-110 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Hirsch, Samuel 1815-1889, Die Religionsphilosophie der Juden
/ Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831, Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion
/ Bibel. Genesis 3
/ Liberté
/ Monothéisme
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion BH Judaïsme NBC Dieu NBE Anthropologie TJ Époque moderne VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Samuel Hirsch
B Die Religionsphilosophie der Juden / The Religious Philosophy of the Jews B Emmanuel Levinas B G. W. F. Hegel B Genesis 3 B Franz Rosenzweig B Hermann Cohen B ethical monotheism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This essay examines Samuel Hirsch’s Religious Philosophy of the Jews as a forerunner of twentieth-century works of ethical monotheism in modern Jewish thought. In particular, it explores Hirsch’s use of the dichotomy between monotheism and idolatry as a way to resist Hegel’s attempts to incorporate Judaism into his developmental history of religion. Hirsch frames his opposition to the Hegelian account of religion by means of providing a rival interpretation of Genesis 3 to that offered by Hegel in the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion. After juxtaposing Hegel’s and Hirsch’s respective interpretations of Genesis 3, I explore Hirsch’s account of religion, which, unlike Hegel’s, is presented in terms of the dichotomy of true and false religion. Finally, I will briefly highlight how Hirsch’s basic strategy for understanding Judaism vis-à-vis other religions—namely, casting the dichotomy between monotheism and idolatry in starkly ethical terms—is taken up and utilized by Hermann Cohen and Emmanuel Levinas in the twentieth century. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816019000361 |