Does "Divine Hiddenness" Neutralize the Problem of Evil?: Is Process Theodicy More Adequate? : A Constructive Process Critique of Paul Moser's Proposals
This article critically engages Paul Moser’s "Divine Hiddenness Response" to the problem of evil - an approach to have recently come out of traditional free-will theism. I begin with identifying the initial common ground between Mosers thought and process theology that arguably coincides w...
| Subtitles: | Special focus section |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Illinois Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
Process studies
Year: 2020, Volume: 49, Issue: 1, Pages: 36-53 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theodicy
/ Omnipotence
/ Process theology
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article critically engages Paul Moser’s "Divine Hiddenness Response" to the problem of evil - an approach to have recently come out of traditional free-will theism. I begin with identifying the initial common ground between Mosers thought and process theology that arguably coincides with what can be called the "Four Noble Truths of Christianity". Howevery when confronted with the problem of evil that threatens the credibility of these truths. Moser offers an epistemic strategy to address this threat without modifying the classical concept of omnipotence and without having a full-explanation theodicy. I will argue that, far from helping the situation, this approach exacerbates it and is therefore strongly undesirable. In addition, Moser’s assumption of the absence of an adequate theodicy is unjustified in light of the demonstrable merits of process theodicy in accomplishing what omnipotence-preserving approaches cannot do - defusing the defeaters to Christianity’s Four Noble Truths effectively. Thusy it is desirable andy in the absence of better optionsy epistemically obligatory that omnipotence be modified and replaced with a version of God’s perfect power that is more coherent and evidence-based, and is also in line with a significant strand within the Bible. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2154-3682 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Divine Power, Friendship, and Theodicy (2020)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Process studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/process20204912 |