Secularization - Still Going Strong?: What Remains When Cross-sectional Differences Are Eliminated from a Longitudinal Analysis

The tendency of decreasing religiosity is explained by the theory of secularization through differentiation and pluralization. Using the ess 2002-2016, the impacts of both on church attendance and self-ascribed religiosity are tested, controlling for determinants of religiosity—that is, for belongin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Meulemann, Heiner 1944- (VerfasserIn) ; Schmidt, Alexander 1983- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill [2020]
In: Journal of religion in Europe
Jahr: 2019, Band: 12, Heft: 3, Seiten: 231-259
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Säkularismus / Religionslosigkeit / Längsschnittuntersuchung
RelBib Classification:AA Religionswissenschaft
AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
weitere Schlagwörter:B Cohort analysis
B longitudinal multi-level analysis
B self-attributed religiosity
B Pluralization
B Church Attendance
B Differentiation
Online Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The tendency of decreasing religiosity is explained by the theory of secularization through differentiation and pluralization. Using the ess 2002-2016, the impacts of both on church attendance and self-ascribed religiosity are tested, controlling for determinants of religiosity—that is, for belonging (cohort and denomination) and choice (education, urban residence, marriage, parenthood, and employment)—with multi-level models separating between- from within-country effects. Without controls, time negatively affects religiosity: there is a secularization tendency. But controlling for cohort and denomination annihilates this effect and strongly reduces individual-level as well as country-level error variances. Effects of belonging are stronger than those of choice, cohort succession has a negative effect, and religiosity differs between denominations. Differentiation and pluralization have only a few effects between countries and only one within countries such that secularization theory is not confirmed.
ISSN:1874-8929
Enthält:Enthalten in: Journal of religion in Europe
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/18748929-01203001