Secularization research and its competitors: A response to my critics
This article is a response to the articles published in this issue of Social Compass by François Gauthier, Tobias Müller, David Voas and Sarah Wilkens-Laflamme about the presidential address given by Jörg Stolz at the SISR Congress in July 2019 and titled Secularization theories in the twenty-first...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| In: |
Social compass
Year: 2020, Volume: 67, Issue: 2, Pages: 337-346 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Science of Religion
/ Secularization
/ Theory
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
| Further subjects: | B
Deprivation
B Pluralism B Régulation B Socialisation B secular competition B déprivation B Regulation B compétition laïque B Pluralisme B Socialization |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Summary: | This article is a response to the articles published in this issue of Social Compass by François Gauthier, Tobias Müller, David Voas and Sarah Wilkens-Laflamme about the presidential address given by Jörg Stolz at the SISR Congress in July 2019 and titled Secularization theories in the twenty-first century: Ideas, evidence, and problems. Cet article constitue une réponse aux articles de débats publiés dans ce numéro de Social Compass par François Gauthier, Tobias Müller, David Voas et Sarah Wilkens-Laflamme à propos du discours présidentiel par Jörg Stolz lors du Congrès de la SISR de juillet 2019 et intitulée Secularization theories in the twenty-first century: Ideas, evidence, and problems. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1461-7404 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Social compass
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0037768620917331 |