Heterodox Hegels: heresiology in de Lubac and Bulgakov
This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac&...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
Dans: |
Scottish journal of theology
Année: 2020, Volume: 73, Numéro: 1, Pages: 31-42 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831
/ Réception <scientifique>
/ Bulgakov, Sergej Nikolaevič 1871-1944
/ Lubac, Henri de 1896-1991
/ Critique
/ Hérésie
/ Joachimisme
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Henri de Lubac
B G. W. F. Hegel B heresiology B Sergius Bulgakov |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | This paper considers two twentieth-century heresiological critiques of G. W. F. Hegel. That Henri de Lubac and Sergius Bulgakov should both worry at Hegel's heresy' is hardly surprising. More surprising, however, is how and that each charges Hegel with a different heresy. Though de Lubac's heresiological critique has proven more influential, I commend Bulgakov's. The paper concludes by querying the very strategy of assaying philosophers like Hegel heresiologically. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003693061900070X |