Augustine and Natural Law: Negotiating the Saeculum with Markus, Milbank, and Mathewes
Contemporary Augustinian political theology has encompassed numerous interpretations of Augustine's understanding of the two cities, but a common feature of many is a denial of the presence of natural law in the bishop's thought. This paper surveys three major interpreters of Augustine - R...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Political theology
Année: 2019, Volume: 20, Numéro: 7, Pages: 595-612 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430
/ Droit naturel
/ Markus, R. A. 1924-2010
/ Milbank, John 1952-
/ Mathewes, Charles T. 1969-
|
| RelBib Classification: | CG Christianisme et politique KAB Christianisme primitif KAJ Époque contemporaine VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Augustine
B John Milbank B Creation B Natural Law B Charles Mathewes B use-enjoyment B Robert A. Markus |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | Contemporary Augustinian political theology has encompassed numerous interpretations of Augustine's understanding of the two cities, but a common feature of many is a denial of the presence of natural law in the bishop's thought. This paper surveys three major interpreters of Augustine - Robert Markus, John Milbank, and Charles Mathewes - and their conceptions of the secular and its relation to natural law. It argues first that, despite major divergences, they share a common distrust of natural law. Second, drawing on Vincent Lloyd's distinction of natural law as process versus product, I suggest a picture of what a uniquely Augustinian account of natural law might entail, grounded in a semiotic theory of creation, a distinction between orders of nature and wills, and a view of the use-enjoyment paradigm. An Augustinian natural law, then, is not only warranted but also may be a useful means of rapprochement between Augustinians and natural law theologians. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1631549 |