Jamesian Finite Theism and the Problems of Suffering

William James advocated a form of finite theism, motivated by epistemological and moral concerns with scholastic theism and pantheism. In this article, I elaborate James's case for finite theism and his strategy for dealing with these concerns, which I dub the problems of suffering. I contend t...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Stepanenko, Walter Scott (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2018]
Dans: European journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2018, Volume: 10, Numéro: 4, Pages: 1-25
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B James, William 1842-1910 / Théisme / Finitude / Souffrance
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
Sujets non-standardisés:B finite theism
B Theism
B Pragmatism
B William James
B problem of evil
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (KW)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:William James advocated a form of finite theism, motivated by epistemological and moral concerns with scholastic theism and pantheism. In this article, I elaborate James's case for finite theism and his strategy for dealing with these concerns, which I dub the problems of suffering. I contend that James is at the very least implicitly aware that the problem of suffering is not so much one generic problem but a family of related problems. I argue that one of James's great contributions to philosophical theism is his advocacy for the view that adequate theistic philosophizing is not so much about cracking this family of problems, but finding a version of the problem to embrace.
Contient:Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v10i4.1966