Animal suffering as a challenge to theistic theodicy

In the current debate on theodicy, the problem of animal suffering is becoming increasingly relevant, as demonstrated by some recent books devoted to this topic (M. J. Murray, N. Hoggard, T. Daugherty). Such a problem is particularly challenging for a theistic theodicy, as its traditional arguments...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aguti, Andrea 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis [2017]
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 78, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 498-510
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Neocartesianism / Theodicy / Suffering / Protection of animals ethics
RelBib Classification:NBC Doctrine of God
NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Evil
B Theodicy
B Animal Suffering
B God
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1640200118
003 DE-627
005 20171220142920.0
007 tu
008 171218s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21692327.2017.1356742  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1640200118 
035 |a (DE-576)496508288 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ496508288 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)134224140  |0 (DE-627)564814008  |0 (DE-576)184125367  |4 aut  |a Aguti, Andrea  |d 1967- 
109 |a Aguti, Andrea 1967- 
245 1 0 |a Animal suffering as a challenge to theistic theodicy  |c Andrea Aguti 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the current debate on theodicy, the problem of animal suffering is becoming increasingly relevant, as demonstrated by some recent books devoted to this topic (M. J. Murray, N. Hoggard, T. Daugherty). Such a problem is particularly challenging for a theistic theodicy, as its traditional arguments (such as free will argument or soul-making theodicy) do not seem able to deal with it. In the first instance, the article aims to provide a brief overview of the main arguments sustained by theists regarding animal suffering, and secondly to provide an evaluation of such arguments which might be useful for further research on this topic. 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a Evil 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
650 4 |a Animal Suffering 
650 4 |a God 
652 |a NBC:NCG:VA 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4236473-5  |0 (DE-627)700136223  |0 (DE-576)21039711X  |2 gnd  |a Neocartesianismus 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059740-4  |0 (DE-627)104589558  |0 (DE-576)209132027  |2 gnd  |a Theodizee 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4035177-4  |0 (DE-627)106249088  |0 (DE-576)209011076  |2 gnd  |a Leid 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4194901-8  |0 (DE-627)105215929  |0 (DE-576)210097477  |2 gnd  |a Tierethik 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of philosophy and theology  |d Abingdon : Taylor & Francis, 2013  |g 78(2017), 4/5, Seite 498-510  |w (DE-627)731333977  |w (DE-600)2692944-2  |w (DE-576)381569306  |x 2169-2327  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:78  |g year:2017  |g number:4/5  |g pages:498-510 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2017.1356742  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 78  |j 2017  |e 4/5  |h 498-510 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3301630480 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1640200118 
LOK |0 005 20171220144114 
LOK |0 008 171218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052988  |a NCG 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Neocartesianism,Protection of animals ethics,Animal protection ethics,Suffering,Suffering,Suffering in art,Theodicy,Theodicy 
STB 0 0 |a Néocartésianisme,Souffrance,Souffrance,Théodicée,Théodicée,Éthique animale 
STC 0 0 |a Neocartesianismo,Sufrimiento,Sufrimiento,Sufrimiento,Teodicea,Teodicea,Ética animal 
STD 0 0 |a Etica animale,Neocartesianesimo,Sofferenza,Sofferenza,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STE 0 0 |a 保护动物的伦理,痛苦,痛苦,不幸,悲伤,不幸,悲伤,神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论 
STF 0 0 |a 保護動物的倫理,痛苦,痛苦,不幸,悲傷,不幸,悲傷,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論 
STG 0 0 |a Neocartesianismo,Sofrimento,Sofrimento,Teodiceia,Teodiceia,Ética animal 
STH 0 0 |a Животная этика,Неокартезианство,Страдание (мотив),Страдание,Теодицея,Теодицея (мотив) 
STI 0 0 |a Ηθική των ζώων,Θεοδικία,Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Νεοκαρτεσιανισμός,Πόνος <μοτίβο>,Πόνος,Δυστυχία,Κακό,Δοκιμασία,Δυστυχία (μοτίβο),Κακό (μοτίβο),Δοκιμασία (μοτίβο) 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Neokartesianismus,Neukartesianismus,Neucartesianismus , Leiden , Tierschutzethik,Mensch,Tierschutz