Robo-Theisms and Robot Theists: How do Robots Challenge and Reveal Notions of God?
When considering posthuman figures such as robots, artificial intelligences, or even dramatically enhanced human beings, it is not uncommon to regard them as godlike, owing to their superhuman strength, power, and abilities that may transcend the human condition in pursuit of perfection" exemp...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Equinox
[2017]
|
| In: |
Implicit religion
Jahr: 2017, Band: 20, Heft: 3, Seiten: 299-318 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Künstliche Intelligenz
/ Roboter
/ Theismus
/ Gottesfrage
|
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Golem
B Theology B LANGUAGE & languages B Transhumanism B Death of God B Religion B Posthuman B Theological Anthropology B Idolatry B Posthumanism B Robots |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | When considering posthuman figures such as robots, artificial intelligences, or even dramatically enhanced human beings, it is not uncommon to regard them as godlike, owing to their superhuman strength, power, and abilities that may transcend the human condition in pursuit of perfection" exemplified by traits such as immortality or omnipotence. Equally, though, there is a celebration of the human creators of this posthuman progeny, as it is human interests that such robots are made to serve. Thus, there appears to be also an elevation of humans: in religious language and motifs this corresponds to hubris or idolatry; in non-religious terms this raises concerns about the future evolution of the species. Both discussions prompt reflection on our powers and abilities, thereby raising the question of playing God, which this article attends to. The question of posthuman theology, though, is rarely asked or is shunned, which may reveal something about our own sense of religiosity and conceptions of divinity that are transposed onto our creations and our relationships with them. What does it mean to consider a posthuman theology--as affirmative but also disruptive of our own theologically-rooted ideas; and as concealing but also revealing of notions of God? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1743-1697 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Implicit religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/imre.35898 |