Emotional Regulation and Responsibility
I argue that ones responsibility for ones emotions has a two-fold structure: one bears direct responsibility for emotions insofar as they are the upshot of first-order evaluative judgements concerning reasons of fit; and one bears derivative responsibility for them insofar as they are consequences...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2015]
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Jahr: 2015, Band: 18, Heft: 3, Seiten: 487-500 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCB Individualethik ZD Psychologie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Reasons
B Regulation B Emotion B Responsibility |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | I argue that ones responsibility for ones emotions has a two-fold structure: one bears direct responsibility for emotions insofar as they are the upshot of first-order evaluative judgements concerning reasons of fit; and one bears derivative responsibility for them insofar as they are consequences of activities of emotional self-regulation, which can reflect ones take on second-order reasons concerning the strategic, prudential, or moral desirability of undergoing a particular emotion in a particular context. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-014-9535-7 |