Sensitivity, Reflective Knowledge, and Skepticism

Michael Huemer, Ernest Sosa, and Jonathan Vogel have offered a critique of the sensitivity condition on knowledge. According to them, the condition implies that you cannot know of any particular proposition that you do not falsely believe it. Their arguments rest on the claim that you cannot sensiti...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Immerman, Daniel (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2016
Dans: International journal for the study of skepticism
Année: 2016, Volume: 6, Numéro: 4, Pages: 351-367
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Connaissance / Sensitivité / Scepticisme
Sujets non-standardisés:B sensitivity reflective knowledge skepticism internalism externalism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Michael Huemer, Ernest Sosa, and Jonathan Vogel have offered a critique of the sensitivity condition on knowledge. According to them, the condition implies that you cannot know of any particular proposition that you do not falsely believe it. Their arguments rest on the claim that you cannot sensitively believe of any particular proposition that you do not falsely believe it. However, as we shall see, these philosophers are mistaken. You can do so. That said, these philosophers were close to the mark. There are some related propositions that you cannot believe sensitively. These propositions are interesting in another respect: they can be used to construct a new skeptical argument that is superior in some respects to a more traditional skeptical argument. This new skeptical argument also reveals insights about the relationship between internalism, externalism, and skepticism.
ISSN:2210-5700
Contient:In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00511173