Contrastivism and Skepticism
Recently, Jonathan Schaffer (and others) has defended a contrastivist analysis of knowledge. By appealing to his account, he has attempted to steer a path between skepticism and Moore-style antiskepticism: much like sensitivity theorists and contextualists, he offers significant concessions to, but...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2012
|
| Dans: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Année: 2012, Volume: 2, Numéro: 1, Pages: 51-58 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Skepticism
contrastivism
knowledge
closure
Schaffer
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | Recently, Jonathan Schaffer (and others) has defended a contrastivist analysis of knowledge. By appealing to his account, he has attempted to steer a path between skepticism and Moore-style antiskepticism: much like sensitivity theorists and contextualists, he offers significant concessions to, but ultimately rejects, both. In this essay I suggest that in fact Schaffer ends up succumbing to skepticism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2210-5700 |
| Contient: | In: International journal for the study of skepticism
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/221057011X588019 |