What Religion Can Be: Mongolian Classifications, Comparative Perspectives, and a Global View
This article highlights some important conclusions in Karénina Kollmar-Paulenz's study, "Lamas and Shamans," and offers some reflections on its relevance for the study of religion more broadly. It argues that comparing the Tibetan/Mongolian process of creating a classification system...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
E-Zeitschrift AЯGOS
2024
|
| In: |
AЯGOS
Year: 2024, Pages: 48-55 |
| Further subjects: | B
Karénina Kollmar-Paulenz
B Comparison |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This article highlights some important conclusions in Karénina Kollmar-Paulenz's study, "Lamas and Shamans," and offers some reflections on its relevance for the study of religion more broadly. It argues that comparing the Tibetan/Mongolian process of creating a classification system for religion(s) with the parallel and analogous process in "Western" discourses can yield important insights, especially for the endeavor of category formation, which is crucial in Religious Studies. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Sonderheft: Towards a Global History of Religion |
| ISSN: | 2813-4184 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Lamas and Shamans (2024)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: AЯGOS
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.26034/fr.argos.2024.4751 |