Religious Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election: Testing Alternative Theories

Scholars of American electoral politics have documented the recent partisan realignment of religious groups. Indeed, careful analysts often find that religious variables are better predictors of partisan choice than classic socioeconomic divisions. Still, there has been relatively little effort to p...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:"Religion and American Presidential Elections 2020"
Authors: Kellstedt, Lyman A. (Author) ; Guth, James L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: CEEOL 2021
In: Politikologija religije
Year: 2021, Volume: 15, Issue: 2, Pages: 257-284
Further subjects:B ethnoreligious
B traditionalists
B modernists
B restructuring theory
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Scholars of American electoral politics have documented the recent partisan realignment of religious groups. Indeed, careful analysts often find that religious variables are better predictors of partisan choice than classic socioeconomic divisions. Still, there has been relatively little effort to put this religious realignment in both theoretical and historical perspective. In this article, we update our previous work on the historical evolution of religious partisanship, demonstrating the continued relevance of ethnocultural (or ethnoreligious) theory, utilized by political historians, and restructuring theory, an important sociological perspective. Both viewpoints help us understand presidential elections since the 1930s, as we demonstrate with data from a wide range of surveys. After utilizing the 2020 Cooperative Election Study to examine the contemporary voting of ethnoreligious groups in greater detail, we test the impact of religious variables controlling for other demographic, attitudinal, and partisan influences and find that religious identities and orientations often retain independent influence even under stringent controls for other factors shaping the presidential vote.
ISSN:1820-659X
Contains:Enthalten in: Politikologija religije
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.54561/prj1502257k