Halakhic Crypticity

Medieval Jewish philosophers used cryptic writing 1) to protect innocent believers whose faith could be harmed by uncustomary ideas; 2) to protect the philosopher, whose societal standing might be risked through the expression of uncustomary views; and 3) as a normative characteristic of how philoso...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Mashiach, Amir (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2024
Dans: The review of rabbinic Judaism
Année: 2024, Volume: 27, Numéro: 1, Pages: 53-70
Sujets non-standardisés:B Halakha
B responsa literature
B Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach
B Jewish Law
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Medieval Jewish philosophers used cryptic writing 1) to protect innocent believers whose faith could be harmed by uncustomary ideas; 2) to protect the philosopher, whose societal standing might be risked through the expression of uncustomary views; and 3) as a normative characteristic of how philosophy was written. This article demonstrates that, in the halakhic literature, this same technique was utilized by halakhic decisors, and for reasons similar to those of philosophers. A contemporary example helps to make the point. Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, one of the most prominent twentieth century rabbis, used this approach for two of the three reasons cited: to protect readers from falling into inappropriate religious practice and to protect his own status in a community that valued halakhic uniformity. Rabbi Auerbach thus exemplifies the use of halakhic crypticity to maintain a distinction between theoretical “decisions rules” and practical “conduct rules.”
ISSN:1570-0704
Contient:Enthalten in: The review of rabbinic Judaism
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700704-20240003