"Bistu een Occedenter oyder Substansioner?": Einige Bemerkungen zu den Leitbegriffen im sogenannten Erbsündenstreit zwischen den Anhängern des Flacius und seinen Gegnern
The dispute over the doctrine of original sin between the Flacians and their opponents is essentially determined by the conceptual pair of substance and accidents. This study's focuses on the dialectic prevails between the two concepts. In addition, it also presents the historical contexts in w...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
2024
|
| In: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Year: 2024, Volume: 70, Issue: 1, Pages: 4-20 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Flacius, Matthias 1520-1575
/ Original sin
/ Quarreling
/ Substance
/ Accidens
|
| RelBib Classification: | KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance KBB German language area NBE Anthropology VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The dispute over the doctrine of original sin between the Flacians and their opponents is essentially determined by the conceptual pair of substance and accidents. This study's focuses on the dialectic prevails between the two concepts. In addition, it also presents the historical contexts in which these concepts have been employed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-8020 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2024.70.1.4 |