Tiberian Dagesh Lene: A Response to Wormser
In the previous installment of Textus, Yehonatan Wormser acutely argued that the so-called dagesh lene in the standard Tiberian tradition was pronounced as a geminate consonant, effectively neutralising the distinction between lene and forte. This he did by invoking the “principle of economy” and co...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
2023
|
| In: |
Textus
Year: 2023, Volume: 32, Issue: 1, Pages: 89-105 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hebrew language
/ Massorah
/ Grammar
/ Writing
/ Tiberias
|
| RelBib Classification: | BH Judaism HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
economy, principle of
B Vocalization B dagesh B non-standard B Tiberian B transcriptions, Karaite B shewa |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In the previous installment of Textus, Yehonatan Wormser acutely argued that the so-called dagesh lene in the standard Tiberian tradition was pronounced as a geminate consonant, effectively neutralising the distinction between lene and forte. This he did by invoking the “principle of economy” and comparing the dagesh to the shewa, as well as by drawing evidence from Karaite transcriptions and non-standard Tiberian manuscripts. I argue that his claim is not supported by his evidence: the transcriptions and non-standard manuscripts do not reflect the mainstream Tiberian tradition, but rather a late development; and the principle of economy does not apply in the cases of complementary distribution. Wormser’s analogy between dagesh and shewa is also addressed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2589-255X |
| Reference: | Kommentar zu "The Pronunciation of the Dagesh Lene in the Tiberian Hebrew Tradition (2022)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Textus
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/2589255X-bja10032 |