Reason and grief: C.S. Lewis’ apologetic arguments in the face of the loss. Part I. Reason = Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum
Clive S. Lewis is thought to be one of the most important contemporary Christian apologist. In his works, Lewis argued against naturalism and put forward arguments in support of theism. In doing so, he referred to experience and made use of laws of logic and probabilistic reasoning, hence meeting ra...
Subtitles: | Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | Polish |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze
2019
|
In: |
Przegla̜d religioznawczy
Year: 2019, Issue: 1/271 |
Further subjects: | B
C.S. Lewis
B Theism B argument from numinous experience B argument from reason B argument from morality B Naturalism B argument from desire |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1851087699 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240328080728.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230627s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||pol c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)1851087699 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1851087699 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a pol | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bylica, Piotr |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reason and grief: C.S. Lewis’ apologetic arguments in the face of the loss. Part I. Reason |b = Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum |
246 | 3 | 1 | |a Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Clive S. Lewis is thought to be one of the most important contemporary Christian apologist. In his works, Lewis argued against naturalism and put forward arguments in support of theism. In doing so, he referred to experience and made use of laws of logic and probabilistic reasoning, hence meeting rationality criteria. Part I discusses Lewis’s arguments from the existence of morality, reason, desires and numinous experiences. It presents a basal criticism of these arguments. Except of the ptresentation of those arguments and their analysis the aim of the paper is to provide a basis for a comparison (in Part II) of the anti-naturalistic arguments with what Lewis wrote about God, faith and life after death in the period following the passing of his wife, a great loss for the thinker. | ||
650 | 4 | |a C.S. Lewis | |
650 | 4 | |a argument from desire | |
650 | 4 | |a argument from morality | |
650 | 4 | |a argument from numinous experience | |
650 | 4 | |a argument from reason | |
650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Przegla̜d religioznawczy |d Warszawa : Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze, 2004 |g (2019), 1/271 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1767752121 |w (DE-600)3091285-4 |x 2658-1531 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2019 |g number:1/271 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.ptr.edu.pl/index.php/ptr/article/view/74 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4343958817 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1851087699 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230627135934 | ||
LOK | |0 008 230627||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |