Reason and grief: C.S. Lewis’ apologetic arguments in the face of the loss. Part I. Reason = Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum

Clive S. Lewis is thought to be one of the most important contemporary Christian apologist. In his works, Lewis argued against naturalism and put forward arguments in support of theism. In doing so, he referred to experience and made use of laws of logic and probabilistic reasoning, hence meeting ra...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum
Main Author: Bylica, Piotr (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Polish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze 2019
In: Przegla̜d religioznawczy
Year: 2019, Issue: 1/271
Further subjects:B C.S. Lewis
B Theism
B argument from numinous experience
B argument from reason
B argument from morality
B Naturalism
B argument from desire
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1851087699
003 DE-627
005 20240328080728.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230627s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||pol c
035 |a (DE-627)1851087699 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1851087699 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a pol 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bylica, Piotr  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Reason and grief: C.S. Lewis’ apologetic arguments in the face of the loss. Part I. Reason  |b  = Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum 
246 3 1 |a Rozum wobec żałoby: argumenty apologetyczne C.S. Lewisa w obliczu dotkliwej straty. Część I: Rozum 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Clive S. Lewis is thought to be one of the most important contemporary Christian apologist. In his works, Lewis argued against naturalism and put forward arguments in support of theism. In doing so, he referred to experience and made use of laws of logic and probabilistic reasoning, hence meeting rationality criteria. Part I discusses Lewis’s arguments from the existence of morality, reason, desires and numinous experiences. It presents a basal criticism of these arguments. Except of the ptresentation of those arguments and their analysis the aim of the paper is to provide a basis for a comparison (in Part II) of the anti-naturalistic arguments with what Lewis wrote about God, faith and life after death in the period following the passing of his wife, a great loss for the thinker. 
650 4 |a C.S. Lewis 
650 4 |a argument from desire 
650 4 |a argument from morality 
650 4 |a argument from numinous experience 
650 4 |a argument from reason 
650 4 |a Naturalism 
650 4 |a Theism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Przegla̜d religioznawczy  |d Warszawa : Polskie Towarzyrtwo Religioznawcze, 2004  |g (2019), 1/271  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1767752121  |w (DE-600)3091285-4  |x 2658-1531  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2019  |g number:1/271 
856 4 0 |u https://journal.ptr.edu.pl/index.php/ptr/article/view/74  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4343958817 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1851087699 
LOK |0 005 20230627135934 
LOK |0 008 230627||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL