‘A Rose by Any Other Name?’: Navigating through the Maze of Religious Dialogue Descriptions
The field of religious dialogue is fraught with a bewildering variety of names to describe essentially four basic interrelationships, namely: (a) interreligious dialogue, (b) intrareligious dialogue, (c) interideological dialogue, and (d) intraideological dialogue. These taxonomic relationships, oth...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox Publ.
2004
|
In: |
Journal for the academic study of religion
Year: 2004, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 94-121 |
Further subjects: | B
TBC
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The field of religious dialogue is fraught with a bewildering variety of names to describe essentially four basic interrelationships, namely: (a) interreligious dialogue, (b) intrareligious dialogue, (c) interideological dialogue, and (d) intraideological dialogue. These taxonomic relationships, other naming variants, and a survey of evaluative dialogue labels were identified and briefly explicated. It was concluded that academic precision requires a more thoughtful consideration of what one actually means by "dialogue". General nomenclature recommendations were proffered. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2047-7058 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the academic study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jasr.v17i1.4038 |