The importance and limitations of ‘Choice’ in child-rearing practices for non-believing older adults
Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This ar...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
2023
|
| Dans: |
Religion
Année: 2023, Volume: 53, Numéro: 2, Pages: 335-357 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Großbritannien
/ Wahlmöglichkeit
/ Éducation
/ Irréligion
/ Laïcité
/ Transmission
/ Foi
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AG Vie religieuse AH Pédagogie religieuse CB Spiritualité chrétienne KBF Îles britanniques TK Époque contemporaine |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Non-belief
B parenting practices B Socialisation B Transmission B Religion B Secularisation B Gender B Rapport d’expérience 1960-1969 B Non-religion |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This article draws on a qualitative study of non-believing older adults in England, reflecting on their practices of child-rearing and socialisation in the second half of the twentieth century, a period identified as crucial to secularisation processes in the UK and elsewhere. Discussions around the importance of ‘choice’ for children in relation to religion are central to participants’ narratives, yet it is shown how freedom of choice is more complex in reality. It also reveals how notions of ‘choice’ and ‘freedom’ in relation to religion can reflect certain social structures, such as gender, and could sit in tension with respondents’ own wishes and desires. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1096-1151 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2023.2186960 |