The importance and limitations of ‘Choice’ in child-rearing practices for non-believing older adults

Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This ar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Malone, Joanna (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2023
In: Religion
Year: 2023, Volume: 53, Issue: 2, Pages: 335-357
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Great Britain / Wahlmöglichkeit / Education / Irreligiosity / Secularism / Transmission / Faith
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AG Religious life; material religion
AH Religious education
CB Christian life; spirituality
KBF British Isles
TK Recent history
Further subjects:B Non-belief
B parenting practices
B Socialisation
B Transmission
B Religion
B Secularisation
B Gender
B Experience account 1960-1969
B Non-religion
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This article draws on a qualitative study of non-believing older adults in England, reflecting on their practices of child-rearing and socialisation in the second half of the twentieth century, a period identified as crucial to secularisation processes in the UK and elsewhere. Discussions around the importance of ‘choice’ for children in relation to religion are central to participants’ narratives, yet it is shown how freedom of choice is more complex in reality. It also reveals how notions of ‘choice’ and ‘freedom’ in relation to religion can reflect certain social structures, such as gender, and could sit in tension with respondents’ own wishes and desires.
ISSN:1096-1151
Contains:Enthalten in: Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2023.2186960