The importance and limitations of ‘Choice’ in child-rearing practices for non-believing older adults

Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Malone, Joanna (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Routledge 2023
In: Religion
Jahr: 2023, Band: 53, Heft: 2, Seiten: 335-357
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Großbritannien / Wahlmöglichkeit / Erziehung / Areligiosität / Säkularismus / Weitergabe / Glaube
RelBib Classification:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
AG Religiöses Leben; materielle Religion
AH Religionspädagogik
CB Christliche Existenz; Spiritualität
KBF Britische Inseln
TK Neueste Zeit
weitere Schlagwörter:B Non-belief
B parenting practices
B Socialisation
B Transmission
B Religion
B Secularisation
B Erlebnisbericht 1960-1969
B Gender
B Non-religion
Online Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rising numbers of ‘religious nones’ across many former Christian liberal democracies have brought about increasing academic research to understand this growing population. Questions remain, however, about the mechanisms involved in processes of secularisationr and the growth of non-religion. This article draws on a qualitative study of non-believing older adults in England, reflecting on their practices of child-rearing and socialisation in the second half of the twentieth century, a period identified as crucial to secularisation processes in the UK and elsewhere. Discussions around the importance of ‘choice’ for children in relation to religion are central to participants’ narratives, yet it is shown how freedom of choice is more complex in reality. It also reveals how notions of ‘choice’ and ‘freedom’ in relation to religion can reflect certain social structures, such as gender, and could sit in tension with respondents’ own wishes and desires.
ISSN:1096-1151
Enthält:Enthalten in: Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2023.2186960