Metodologias desenvolvidas pela genealogia intelectual da ciência da religião
This paper demonstrates that the study of religions is an autonomous science and that its researchers have constructed several methods of studing religions, from its birth in the 19th century to the present. For this, a bibliographic review is carried out with a specific selection of authors who hav...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Portugiesisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Instituto de Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
2017
|
| In: |
Sacrilegens
Jahr: 2017, Band: 14, Heft: 1, Seiten: 70-89 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Scientific methodology
B Classificatory methods B Methodological agnosticism B Comparative methods B Empirical Research |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper demonstrates that the study of religions is an autonomous science and that its researchers have constructed several methods of studing religions, from its birth in the 19th century to the present. For this, a bibliographic review is carried out with a specific selection of authors who have written within intellectual genealogies that describe the study of religion as an autonomous science. Four types of methods are discussed in this text: the main models for empirical research, the comparative methods, the classificatory methods, and the methodological attitude towards the object. This text points to the need for scholars of religion in Brazil to dominate its own history and to know the questions surrounding its international debates regarding methodology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2237-6151 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Sacrilegens
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.34019/2237-6151.2017.v14.26967 |