What’s missing from the scientific study of religion?
I argue that three questions are invariably overlooked in the study of religion: (1) why religions, and particularly shamanic-type religions, evolved, (2) why doctrinal religions evolved a mere 8000 years ago, and (3) why only humans have religion.
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Routledge
2017
|
Dans: |
Religion, brain & behavior
Année: 2017, Volume: 7, Numéro: 4, Pages: 349-353 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Mentalizing
B Shamanism B Social bonding B Neolithic revolution |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | I argue that three questions are invariably overlooked in the study of religion: (1) why religions, and particularly shamanic-type religions, evolved, (2) why doctrinal religions evolved a mere 8000 years ago, and (3) why only humans have religion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-5981 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion, brain & behavior
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249927 |