The architecture of apophasis: exploring options for a cognitive scientific interpretation of the via negativa

This article charts possibilities for discerning cognitive mechanisms that mediate apophatic cognition (and its purportedly self-transforming effects) in negative streams of Christian thought and practice. First, it tests the extent to which (1) Schjoedt’s et al. "cognitive depletion" mode...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Hollingsworth, Andrea (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Routledge 2016
In: Religion, brain & behavior
Jahr: 2016, Band: 6, Heft: 4, Seiten: 290-306
weitere Schlagwörter:B Cognitive Science
B Spirituality
B Neuroscience
B Mysticism
B Psychology
B Relationality
B Emotion
B Apophaticism
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article charts possibilities for discerning cognitive mechanisms that mediate apophatic cognition (and its purportedly self-transforming effects) in negative streams of Christian thought and practice. First, it tests the extent to which (1) Schjoedt’s et al. "cognitive depletion" model (Schjoedt et al., 2013) and (2) McNamara’s "decentering" model (McNamara, 2009) can explain, biologically and psychologically, why epistemic and existential loss is often said to precede and attend illumination in the via negativa - or negative way. While McNamara’s theory proves more convincing than Schjoedt’s et al. for shedding light on cognitive underpinnings of the negative way, neither theory is fully satisfactory because neither adequately accounts for the constitutive role of social and emotional dynamics at each step in the Christian apophatic journey. The final section introduces a cognitively informed account of the apophatic path consisting of four moments: Resonance, Rupture, Reappraisal, and Repair. This account is supported largely by a turn to neurocognitive, developmental, and clinical psychological research on relationality and emotion regulation.
ISSN:2153-5981
Enthält:Enthalten in: Religion, brain & behavior
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2015.1032998