THE IS AND MORAL OUGHT OF INTER SUBJECTIVITY

The paper analyzes the possibility and moral normativity of intersubjectivity — here understood as referring to the kind of human interaction that respects the personhood of human beings. The analysis of the possibility of intersubjectivity inquires into the conditions of its occurrence; while the a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Napoleon M. Mabaquiao, Jr (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Dharmaram College 2017
In: Journal of Dharma
Year: 2017, Volume: 42, Issue: 3, Pages: 271-288
Further subjects:B Human Interaction
B Intersubjectivity
B Human Dialogue
B Interpersonal Relationship
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1837812500
003 DE-627
005 20230301105948.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230301s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1837812500 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1837812500 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Napoleon M. Mabaquiao, Jr  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a THE IS AND MORAL OUGHT OF INTER SUBJECTIVITY 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The paper analyzes the possibility and moral normativity of intersubjectivity — here understood as referring to the kind of human interaction that respects the personhood of human beings. The analysis of the possibility of intersubjectivity inquires into the conditions of its occurrence; while the analysis of its moral normativity examines the basis of its status as a moral obligation. The paper advances two points. The first is the distinction between theoretical intersubjectivity, where persons are perceived or conceived as subjects and not as objects, and practical intersubjectivity, where persons are treated as ends and not merely as means. The second is the clarification that the imperativity of theoretical intersubjectivity (for involving perceptions and beliefs about persons) is epistemic while that of practical intersubjectivity (for involving intentions and actions towards persons) is moral. Given these points and the questionable status of the possibility of theoretical intersubjectivity (for requiring a nonconceptual knowledge of persons), confusing the latter with practical intersubjectivity would render the morality of intersubjectivity problematic. 
650 4 |a Human Dialogue 
650 4 |a Human Interaction 
650 4 |a Interpersonal Relationship 
650 4 |a Intersubjectivity 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Dharma  |d Bengaluru : Dharmaram College, 1975  |g 42(2017), 3, Seite 271-288  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)1765453895  |w (DE-600)3078855-9  |x 0253-7222  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:42  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g pages:271-288 
856 4 0 |u http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/257  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 42  |j 2017  |e 3  |h 271-288 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4281881271 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1837812500 
LOK |0 005 20230301105948 
LOK |0 008 230301||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL