Religion, Science and Non-science

The inception of anything new (here, science since Galileo and Darwin) should prove to be disastrous (here, science’s seeming antagonism to religion). The initial and seemingly ongoing conflict is, in fact, between scientific dogmas and practices that threaten to be more adequate than those of reli...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Neelamkavil, Raphael (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Review
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Dharmaram College 2004
Dans: Journal of Dharma
Année: 2004, Volume: 29, Numéro: 1, Pages: 112-116
Sujets non-standardisés:B Science and Non-science
B Compte-rendu de lecture
B Religion
B The Nimishakavi K. Subbiah Naidu Endowment Lectures 1998-1999 & The Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Endowment Lectures 2001-2002
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:The inception of anything new (here, science since Galileo and Darwin) should prove to be disastrous (here, science’s seeming antagonism to religion). The initial and seemingly ongoing conflict is, in fact, between scientific dogmas and practices that threaten to be more adequate than those of religion and religious practices and definitions of beliefs that always trade antiques with respect to both the blatantly scientific mind and the deeply intellectually and practically religious soul. As this question is not scientific or religious, it can only be philosophical and epistemological, in particular. Dharmaram Publications is now ready with the second insightful, succinct, satisfying and readable form of some of Prof. William Sweet’s recent reflections on religion.
ISSN:0253-7222
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of Dharma