RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE AND REVELATION

Revelation is always understood in contrast to man's natural religious experience. The problem whether there is real opposition between natural and revealed religious experience is often discussed in the Christian theological tradition, especially in the context of the comparative study of reli...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Mampra, Thomas (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Dharmaram College 1988
Dans: Journal of Dharma
Année: 1988, Volume: 13, Numéro: 4, Pages: 328-350
Sujets non-standardisés:B Revealing Experience
B Religious Experience
B Immediate Experience
B Integral Experience
B Revelation
B History
B Reason
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Revelation is always understood in contrast to man's natural religious experience. The problem whether there is real opposition between natural and revealed religious experience is often discussed in the Christian theological tradition, especially in the context of the comparative study of religions. In this paper I propose to examine S. Radhakrishnan's attempt to reconcile the conflict between natural religious experience and revelation. The main ideas of the author are brought under four main heads: 1) Religious experience; 2) Its Nature; 3) The content of Religious Experience.
ISSN:0253-7222
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of Dharma