Trinitarian theology: Hegelian Vis-A-Vis Advaitic
In order to understand Hegel's contribution to the understanding of the Trinity properly we have to go back to Plato's arguments concerning the absoluteness and inexpressibility of God. For Plato it is impossible to think and express the unity of God, because our thinking is limited and de...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Dharmaram College
1983
|
| In: |
Journal of Dharma
Year: 1983, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 283-295 |
| Further subjects: | B
Hegelian
B Advaitic B Trinitarian Theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1837754292 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230228154430.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1837754292 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1837754292 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Briick, Michael von |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Trinitarian theology: Hegelian Vis-A-Vis Advaitic |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1983 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In order to understand Hegel's contribution to the understanding of the Trinity properly we have to go back to Plato's arguments concerning the absoluteness and inexpressibility of God. For Plato it is impossible to think and express the unity of God, because our thinking is limited and determined by the discrimination of subject and predicate, which means duality in any case. To express God as subject can be done only in a predicative determination. Since the realm of the predicate is always wider than the realm of the subject. it is impossible to go beyond this contradiction. God is one (hén estin). But in this sentence the "is" is only copulative and not an expression of existence since otherwise the One would participate in Being, which presupposes dualism. l This One (hén) does not have any name nor can it be known, because it is the subject of any knowledge. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Advaitic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hegelian | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trinitarian Theology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Dharma |d Bengaluru : Dharmaram College, 1975 |g 8(1983), 3, Seite 283-295 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1765453895 |w (DE-600)3078855-9 |x 0253-7222 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:1983 |g number:3 |g pages:283-295 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dvkjournals.in/index.php/jd/article/view/1649 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 1983 |e 3 |h 283-295 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4277797350 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1837754292 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230228154430 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230228||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||