A Trinitarian Metaphysics of Predestination and Human Freedom
According to Andrea Vestrucci, an oppositional framework governs the debate between free will and determinism, but Martin Luther upends this framework by a view of God that brings free will and determinism together. I argue that this debate is governed by an impersonal dialectic of fate vs. chance....
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Collaborateurs: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
Dans: |
Theology and science
Année: 2020, Volume: 18, Numéro: 3, Pages: 383-390 |
RelBib Classification: | KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance NBC Dieu NBE Anthropologie VA Philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Van Til
B Free Will B Paradox B cosmic personalism B Trinitarian Theology B Predestination |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Résumé: | According to Andrea Vestrucci, an oppositional framework governs the debate between free will and determinism, but Martin Luther upends this framework by a view of God that brings free will and determinism together. I argue that this debate is governed by an impersonal dialectic of fate vs. chance. However, a constructive Trinitarian theology could overcome this impersonal dialectic since the triune God is exhaustively personal. In addition, God’s relationship with creation is analogical, rather than dialectical. Within a Trinitarian framework, therefore, predestination secures human freedom because a personal God establishes the human personality and because divine and human causality vary directly, rather than inversely, within an analogical relationship. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
Référence: | Kritik von "Recalibrating the Logic of Free Will with Martin Luther (2020)"
|
Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2020.1786217 |