Religion in the American Congress: the case of the US House of Representatives, 1953–2003
Although there has been a surge of scholarship on the role of religion in American electoral politics, there has been much less analysis of its influence over the behaviour of public officials, such as national legislators. In this study, I review the literature on religion in the Congress, noting t...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
2014
|
| Dans: |
Religion, state & society
Année: 2014, Volume: 42, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 299-313 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Culture Wars
B roll-call analysis B constituency influence B ethnoreligious affiliation |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1837611432 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230227154022.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/09637494.2014.947067 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1837611432 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1837611432 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Guth, James L. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Guth, James L. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religion in the American Congress: the case of the US House of Representatives, 1953–2003 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Although there has been a surge of scholarship on the role of religion in American electoral politics, there has been much less analysis of its influence over the behaviour of public officials, such as national legislators. In this study, I review the literature on religion in the Congress, noting the limitations of that research, primarily its failure to measure adequately the religious affiliations, activities and beliefs of members. I then outline an alternative approach that promises a fuller assessment, showing how both ethnoreligious affiliation and theological perspectives have influenced legislative voting since the 1950s. Ethnocultural affiliation was the most powerful influence until the 1990s, but has recently been overlain by deepening ‘culture war’ divisions. The study concludes with a stringent multivariate analysis that controls for important variables typically included in legislative roll call analysis, showing that many religious measures survive those controls. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a constituency influence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Culture Wars | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ethnoreligious affiliation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a roll-call analysis | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religion, state & society |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1992 |g 42(2014), 2/3, Seite 299-313 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270928073 |w (DE-600)1478007-0 |w (DE-576)097188581 |x 1465-3974 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2014 |g number:2/3 |g pages:299-313 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2014.947067 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 42 |j 2014 |e 2/3 |h 299-313 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4277352294 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1837611432 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230227154022 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230227||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||