Autonomy, diversity and the common good: Claremont studies in the philosophy of religion, conference 2020

Die Überzeugung, dass die Ausrichtung am Gemeinwohl entscheidend für ein gutes Zusammenleben von Einzelnen und Gruppen in der Gesellschaft sei, hat eine lange Tradition. Das hat sich geändert. Doch wie viel Autonomie und Vielfalt sind möglich, ohne den sozialen Zusammenhalt und die menschliche Solid...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Author: Philosophy of Religion Conference 41. 2020, Claremont, Calif. (Author)
Contributors: Dalferth, Ingolf U. 1948- (Editor) ; Block, Marlene A. (Editor)
Format: Electronic Book
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Tübingen Mohr Siebeck [2023]
In:Year: 2023
Series/Journal:Religion in philosophy and theology 126
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Autonomy / Pluralism / Public good / Ethics / Christian ethics
Further subjects:B Systematic theology
B Collection of essays
B Respect
B Religion
B Practical theology
B Modern age
B Solidarity
B Epidemiology
B Gentile inclusion
B Capitalism
B Cosmopolitanism
B Ethics
B Sozial- / Cultural sciences
B Conference program 2020 (Claremont, Calif)
B Religious philosophy
B God
B Religion in Philosophy and Theology
B Liberalism
Online Access: Inhaltsverzeichnis (Aggregator)
Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:Die Überzeugung, dass die Ausrichtung am Gemeinwohl entscheidend für ein gutes Zusammenleben von Einzelnen und Gruppen in der Gesellschaft sei, hat eine lange Tradition. Das hat sich geändert. Doch wie viel Autonomie und Vielfalt sind möglich, ohne den sozialen Zusammenhalt und die menschliche Solidarität zu zerstören? Und wie viel soziale Gemeinsamkeit ist notwendig, um ein autonomes Leben führen zu können und der Vielfalt gerecht zu werden?InhaltsübersichtI Autonomy and the Common Good Clare Carlisle: The Virtue of Religion: Spinoza on Human Power and the Common Good – Raymond Perrier: The Question of Autonomy and the Common Good in Spinoza's Ethics – Yun Kwon Yoo: Hegel on Autonomy, Diversity, and the Common Good: A Dialectical Perspective and Its Contemporary Anthropological Relevance – Jörg Dierken: Between Participation and Respect: Liberalism, Culturalism and the Common – Andrew Bridges: Hegel's Law of the Heart and the Society of Singularities of the Future – Graham Ward: Religious Hope at the End of Humanism II Diversity and the Common Good Elliot Wolfson: Heeding the Law beyond the Law: Transgendering Alterity and the Hypernomian Perimeter of the Ethical – Josiah Solis: Beyond (the common) Good and Evil – Nils Ole Oermann: About Diversity, Freedom, the Open Society and its Enemies – Robert Overy-Brown: Questioning Values and Working for Freedom in a Time of Viruses and Bullets – Deborah Casewell: On Decreation and Obligation – Tad DeLay: When Forbidden to Think: Against Appeals to the Common Good – Will Mittendorf: Reasonable Pluralism and the Procedure-Independent Standard in Epistemic Democracy – Hartmut von Sass: On Cosmopolitanism: Its Precarious Relation to Religious Belief – Marlene Block: Cosmopolitanism: The Irony, the Tension, the Reductio in Mysterium
Is it true that insistence on autonomy and diversity weakens social cohesion, or that striving for justice, equity and equality undermines individual freedom? A long tradition has seen the common good as the social order in which individuals and groups can best strive for perfection. Liberal societies insist that this perfecting must not be done at the cost of others or by restricting the right to such a striving only to some and not granting it also to others. However, in a time of growing social and cultural diversity and inequality the traditional tensions between individual freedom and social responsibility have increased to a point where the binding forces of our societies seem to be exhausted. How much individuality and what kinds of diversity are we ready to accept? How much autonomy and diversity are possible without destroying social cohesion and human solidarity? And how much social commonality is necessary to be able to live an autonomous life and do justice to diversity?Survey of contentsI Autonomy and the Common Good Clare Carlisle: The Virtue of Religion: Spinoza on Human Power and the Common Good – Raymond Perrier: The Question of Autonomy and the Common Good in Spinoza's Ethics – Yun Kwon Yoo: Hegel on Autonomy, Diversity, and the Common Good: A Dialectical Perspective and Its Contemporary Anthropological Relevance – Jörg Dierken: Between Participation and Respect: Liberalism, Culturalism and the Common – Andrew Bridges: Hegel's Law of the Heart and the Society of Singularities of the Future – Graham Ward: Religious Hope at the End of Humanism II Diversity and the Common Good Elliot Wolfson: Heeding the Law beyond the Law: Transgendering Alterity and the Hypernomian Perimeter of the Ethical – Josiah Solis: Beyond (the common) Good and Evil – Nils Ole Oermann: About Diversity, Freedom, the Open Society and its Enemies – Robert Overy-Brown: Questioning Values and Working for Freedom in a Time of Viruses and Bullets – Deborah Casewell: On Decreation and Obligation – Tad DeLay: When Forbidden to Think: Against Appeals to the Common Good – Will Mittendorf: Reasonable Pluralism and the Procedure-Independent Standard in Epistemic Democracy – Hartmut von Sass: On Cosmopolitanism: Its Precarious Relation to Religious Belief – Marlene Block: Cosmopolitanism: The Irony, the Tension, the Reductio in Mysterium
ISBN:3161621999
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1628/978-3-16-162199-4