Moral Normativity: Naturalism vs. Theism

It is widely assumed that theism is superior to metaphysical naturalism in explaining moral phenomena, especially with regard to the practical aspect of morality. In this article, I will firstly clarify what this practical aspect amounts to and present two challenges against metaphysical naturalism,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yöney, Ferhat (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2023
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2023, Volume: 93, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-23
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Morals / Normativity / Duty / Practice / Theism / Naturalism (Philosophy) / Metaphysics / Metaethics
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBA Dogmatics
NCA Ethics
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:It is widely assumed that theism is superior to metaphysical naturalism in explaining moral phenomena, especially with regard to the practical aspect of morality. In this article, I will firstly clarify what this practical aspect amounts to and present two challenges against metaphysical naturalism, by John Mackie and Richard Joyce. Then, I will critically engage with two main attempts to argue for the superiority of theism over metaphysical naturalism: One of them is the appeal to the existence of afterlife, and the other is Robert Merrihew Adams? divine command metaethics. I will argue that both are problematic for different reasons. Relying on the main aspects of Adams? metaethical framework, I will advance my proposal to maintain the practical aspect of morality which lends theism superiority over metaphysical naturalism, and then follow with certain implications of the proposal for theistic metaethics.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contains:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-022-09841-2