If naturalism is true, then scientific explanation is impossible
I begin by retracing an argument from Aristotle for final causes in science. Then, I advance this ancient thought, and defend an argument for a stronger conclusion: that no scientific explanation can succeed, if Naturalism is true. The argument goes like this: (1) Any scientific explanation can be s...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 2023, Volume: 59, Numéro: 1, Pages: 115-138 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Naturalisme (Philosophie)
/ Science
/ Explication
|
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theism
B Atheism B philosophy of science B Supernaturalism B Philosophy of religion B Scientific Explanation B Naturalism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 183327881X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230802155349.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412522000099 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)183327881X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP183327881X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1052808018 |0 (DE-627)789055686 |0 (DE-576)408537744 |4 aut |a Bogardus, Tomas | |
| 109 | |a Bogardus, Tomas |a Bogardus, Tomás | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a If naturalism is true, then scientific explanation is impossible |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a I begin by retracing an argument from Aristotle for final causes in science. Then, I advance this ancient thought, and defend an argument for a stronger conclusion: that no scientific explanation can succeed, if Naturalism is true. The argument goes like this: (1) Any scientific explanation can be successful only if it crucially involves a natural regularity. Next, I argue that (2) any explanation can be successful only if it crucially involves no element that calls out for explanation but lacks one. From (1) and (2) it follows that (3) a scientific explanation can be successful only if it crucially involves a natural regularity, and this regularity does not call out for explanation while lacking one. I then argue that (4) if Naturalism is true, then all every natural regularity calls out for explanation but lacks one. From (3) and (4) it follows that (5) if Naturalism is true, then no scientific explanation can be successful. If you believe that scientific explanation can be (indeed, often has been) successful, as I do, then this is a reason to reject Naturalism. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philosophy of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Scientific Explanation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supernaturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 652 | |a VA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4171303-5 |0 (DE-627)105395846 |0 (DE-576)209936037 |2 gnd |a Naturalismus |g Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4066562-8 |0 (DE-627)104393998 |0 (DE-576)209165138 |2 gnd |a Wissenschaft |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4015293-5 |0 (DE-627)106337289 |0 (DE-576)208911111 |2 gnd |a Erklärung |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 59(2023), 1, Seite 115-138 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:115-138 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000099 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/if-naturalism-is-true-then-scientific-explanation-is-impossible/2E5DACB5184DFC180CE584C136A2B9B5 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 59 |j 2023 |e 1 |h 115-138 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4267583137 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 183327881X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230802155349 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Explanation,Science,Science,Science in art |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Explication,Science,Science |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ciencia,Ciencia,Ciencias,Explicación |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Scienza <motivo>,Scienza,Sapere,Sapere,Sapere (motivo),Sapere,Spiegazione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 科学,科学,学科,学科,说明,解说,解释 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 科學,科學,學科,學科,說明,解說,解釋 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ciência,Ciência,Explicação |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Наука (мотив),Наука,Объяснение |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Εξήγηση,Επιστήμη (μοτίβο),Επιστήμη |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Science,Wissenschaften,Bürgerliche Wissenschaft,Wissenschaften |