Scientific Naturalism: A Manifesto for Enlightenment Humanism
The success of the Scientific Revolution led to the development of the worldview of scientific naturalism, or the belief that the world is governed by natural laws and forces that can be understood, and that all phenomena are part of nature and can be explained by natural causes, including human cog...
| Autres titres: | Issue Theme: Naturalism - Scientific? Religious? Theological? |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Theology and science
Année: 2017, Volume: 15, Numéro: 3, Pages: 220-230 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion CF Christianisme et science NCA Éthique |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Scientism
B Scientific naturalism B witch crazes B Enlightenment humanism B is-ought fallacy |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | The success of the Scientific Revolution led to the development of the worldview of scientific naturalism, or the belief that the world is governed by natural laws and forces that can be understood, and that all phenomena are part of nature and can be explained by natural causes, including human cognitive, moral and social phenomena. The application of scientific naturalism in the human realm led to the widespread adoption of Enlightenment humanism, a cosmopolitan worldview that places supreme value on science and reason, eschews the supernatural entirely and relies exclusively on nature and nature’s laws, including human nature. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6700 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "Can Science Bridge the Is-Ought gap? (2018)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2017.1335060 |