Arguing for Atonement?
According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his the...
| Published in: | TheoLogica |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
2022
|
| In: |
TheoLogica
|
| RelBib Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God NBK Soteriology VA Philosophy VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Abstract Objects
B Atonement B Aseity B Platonism B Nominalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | According to William Lane Craig, to avoid compromising God’s aseity we must embrace nominalism with respect to mathematical and logical objects. There are no numbers, propositions, possible worlds, properties, or relations. In this paper I argue that Craig’s nominalism threatens to undermine his theological stance on the atonement. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v6i2.63473 |