Conflict and Authority: William of Saint-Thierry and Peter Abelard as Readers of Origen
This study compares how two prominent twelfth-century Latin authors and theological opponents, namely the monastic author William of Saint-Thierry (c. 1080-1148) and the school master Peter Abelard (1079-1142), variously understood the authority of the controversial yet influential Greek author Orig...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2021
|
| In: |
Open theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 531-554 |
| Further subjects: | B
auctoritates
B medieval reception B twelfth-century Latin West B medieval schools B early Cistercians B monastic theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This study compares how two prominent twelfth-century Latin authors and theological opponents, namely the monastic author William of Saint-Thierry (c. 1080-1148) and the school master Peter Abelard (1079-1142), variously understood the authority of the controversial yet influential Greek author Origen (c. 184-253) in their works. Modern scholars who study the reception of Origen in the twelfth-century Latin West have, to this point, spoken of an Origenian revival in this period, concluding that Origen was especially popular in the cloister, among Cistercian monks, such as Bernard of Clairvaux and his followers, like William of Saint-Thierry, based on the assumption that as monks they found his writings more relevant. This study seeks to challenge this scholarly narrative by focusing on two authors who are perceived as typifying two different strands of theology, one of a contemplative character developed in the cloister (William) and one making use of dialectics and developed in the emerging schools (Abelard). By demonstrating that the schoolmaster Abelard drew on Origen to a greater degree and in a more transparent manner than his monastic opponent, this study will show that Origen’s popularity in the cloisters was not, as such, a clear point of distinction between them and schools in the way that has usually been claimed by modern scholarship. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2300-6579 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Open theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/opth-2020-0181 |