Hierarchies: The Core Argument for a Naturalistic Christian Faith

Abstract. This article takes on a perhaps impossible task: not only to reconstruct the core argument of Arthur Peacocke's program in science and religion but also to evaluate it in two major areas where it would seem to be vulnerable, namely, more recent developments in systems biology and the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clayton, Philip 1956- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2008
In: Zygon
Year: 2008, Volume: 43, Issue: 1, Pages: 27-41
Further subjects:B systems biology
B God-world relation
B mind-body problem
B hierarchies
B Complexity Theory
B reaction stoichiometry
B Philosophy of mind
B Divine Action
B mathematical biology
B emergence theory
B levels of the natural world and of explanation
B Arthur Peacocke
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:Abstract. This article takes on a perhaps impossible task: not only to reconstruct the core argument of Arthur Peacocke's program in science and religion but also to evaluate it in two major areas where it would seem to be vulnerable, namely, more recent developments in systems biology and the philosophy of mind. If his theory of hierarchies is to be successful, it must stand up to developments in these two areas and then be able to apply the results in a productive way to Christian theological reflection. Peacocke recognized that one's model of the mind-body relation is crucial for one's position on the God-world relation and divine action. Of the three models that he constructed, it turns out that only the third can serve as a viable model for theology if it is to be more than purely deistic or metaphorical.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contains:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00896.x