Phenomenology and Theology—Reflections on the Study of Religion
The academic study of religious belief and practice is frequently taken to debunk the content of religion. This attitude impedes the science-theology dialogue and causes believers to react defensively toward studies of religion. I argue that a large, although not unrestricted, domain exists in which...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2000
|
Dans: |
Zygon
Année: 2000, Volume: 35, Numéro: 4, Pages: 827-848 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B Belief B Atheism B Objectivity B functional analysis B virus theory B Credibility B Asceticism B ritual of religion B Metaphor B Anthropomorphism B Debunking |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
Résumé: | The academic study of religious belief and practice is frequently taken to debunk the content of religion. This attitude impedes the science-theology dialogue and causes believers to react defensively toward studies of religion. I argue that a large, although not unrestricted, domain exists in which phenomenology of religion is neutral with respect to content, that is, compatible with either belief or unbelief. Theology can constructively interact with secular studies of religion, in some cases even explicitly hostile ones. Three themes emerge that elaborate on this interaction: (1) the claim that a scientific study of religion is capable of refuting belief is a logical mistake; (2) religious practice, and to some extent belief, can benefit from secular scrutiny; (3) the entirety of religious expressions is richer than the content that can be captured by analytical study of the phenomenon. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9744 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Zygon
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/1467-9744.00315 |