Religion and the Theories of Science: A Response to Barbour

Abstract. This paper offers a detailed response to “Religion and the Theories of Science” in Barbour's Gifford Lectures I. Topics include: complementarity, indeterminacy, parts and wholes, and Bell's theorem in quantum theory; metaphysical issues raised by relativity theory and thermodynam...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Russell, Robert J. 1946- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell 1996
Dans: Zygon
Année: 1996, Volume: 31, Numéro: 1, Pages: 29-41
Sujets non-standardisés:B Origins
B genetic mutations
B Design Argument
B Bell's theorem
B Realism
B God's action
B “bottom—up” causality
B creation theology
B Contingency
B Indeterminism
B Thermodynamics
B Quantum Theory
B relativity theory
B Évolution
B Holism
B complementarity
B “top—down” causality
B Temporality
B Astronomy
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Abstract. This paper offers a detailed response to “Religion and the Theories of Science” in Barbour's Gifford Lectures I. Topics include: complementarity, indeterminacy, parts and wholes, and Bell's theorem in quantum theory; metaphysical issues raised by relativity theory and thermodynamics, principally the problem of temporality and “top-down” versus “bottom—up” causality; design arguments and the origins of the universe in astronomy and creation; and God's action in the context of evolution and continuing creation. Areas of agreement and disagreement between Barbour and myself over philosophical and theological implications are presented, and endnotes indicate further areas of conversation.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contient:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1996.tb00005.x