Human Sacrifice : Religious Act or Vicious Desire?: Testing the Limits of Tolerance with Vitoria and Las Casas

Tolerance is often considered a modern social development. However, a robust, if distinctly unmodern, concept of tolerance can be found in the work of Thomas Aquinas. The object of tolerance is a perceived evil which is endured for the sake of averting a greater evil. The paper explores how the conc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Colón-Emeric, Edgardo Antonio 1968- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: De Gruyter 2017
In: Journal of Early Modern Christianity
Jahr: 2017, Band: 4, Heft: 2, Seiten: 227-261
RelBib Classification:BR Altamerikanische Religionen
CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen
KAE Kirchengeschichte 900-1300; Hochmittelalter
KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit
NCA Ethik
weitere Schlagwörter:B Temperance
B Human Sacrifice
B Natural Law
B Tolerance
B virtue of religion
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Tolerance is often considered a modern social development. However, a robust, if distinctly unmodern, concept of tolerance can be found in the work of Thomas Aquinas. The object of tolerance is a perceived evil which is endured for the sake of averting a greater evil. The paper explores how the concept of tolerance which Bartolomé de las Casas and Francisco de Vitoria inherited from Thomas Aquinas was deployed and stretched in response to the Amerindian cult of human sacrifice. Both Spanish Dominicans concur in regarding human sacrifice as an evil act, but they base their judgment on different principles. Las Casas interprets human sacrifice as a question of religion. Vitoria considers it a question of temperance. The result is that Las Casas counsels toleration of the practice, whereas Vitoria justifies military intervention on behalf of the innocent.
ISSN:2196-6656
Enthält:Enthalten in: Journal of Early Modern Christianity
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/jemc-2017-0008