Framing the Homosexuality Debate Theologically: Lessons from the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)

Since 1978, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has relied on legislative procedures to try to resolve the question of the ordination of gay and lesbian persons. In recent years, the legislative debate has become more explicitly theological. Assessment of two major positions in the PC(USA) today, refle...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burgess, John P. 1954- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 1999
In: Review of religious research
Year: 1999, Volume: 41, Issue: 2, Pages: 262-274
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic
Description
Summary:Since 1978, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has relied on legislative procedures to try to resolve the question of the ordination of gay and lesbian persons. In recent years, the legislative debate has become more explicitly theological. Assessment of two major positions in the PC(USA) today, reflected in denominational debates over amendments A and B, reveals profoundly different understandings of sin and repentance, the interpretation of Scripture and the church's confessions, and the relationship of law and grace. Perhaps the key theological issue has been the nature of the church and church unity. Supporters of the ordination of gay and lesbian persons have emphasized institutional unity and denominational power; their opponents, ideological unity and local, congregational power. Pastoral-theological issues further complicate the debate, revealing fundamental tensions within the Christian tradition itself (such as, the theological ideal of heterosexual marriage and the pastoral reality of ministering to single, divorced, and homosexual persons)--and therefore the inadequacies of legislative approaches. In the end, the homosexuality debate raises key questions about the nature of denominationalism at the turn of the century.
ISSN:2211-4866
Contains:Enthalten in: Review of religious research
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/3512110