Transsexualism and Christian Marriage
It is important for the Christian understanding of marriage that the couple should be man and woman, but what is the status of a postoperative transsexual? Against the thesis that someone who was unambiguously a member of one biological sex cannot then become a member of the other, two cases can be...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
1983
|
| Dans: |
Journal of religious ethics
Année: 1983, Volume: 11, Numéro: 1, Pages: 135-162 |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | It is important for the Christian understanding of marriage that the couple should be man and woman, but what is the status of a postoperative transsexual? Against the thesis that someone who was unambiguously a member of one biological sex cannot then become a member of the other, two cases can be made. The psychological case argues that since biological sexuality cannot be considered on its own, the transsexual, by virtue of cross-gender identification, is properly understood as ambiguously sexed. The social case argues that public acceptance of a gender role, even in marriage, does not immediately depend on the "real" sex of the individual. Neither case is without difficulty. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|